>>102338872IQ tests mostly measure how good you are at taking IQ tests, and IIRC the current standard is still some fucking take on the WAISC, which is from...what, the late 50's, with its current form coming about in the 70's or so?
Granted, it's not Stanford-Binet, at least, but it heavily overemphasizes mathematical-logical and visuo-spatial reasoning and ignores the other ways one can measure intelligence.
And frankly, I find the people who boast about their IQ scores to be some of the most unpleasant, needy, egotistical motherfuckers on the planet (before you accuse me of coping, I took an IQ test as a teen and scored pretty highly).
I will say filly is smarter than your average bear, though.
