>>103094528>>103094022Subathons are mostly "streamer gets the money".
I have read a lot of people say this is an argument against her, but she right out of the get go says a portion of the money she was going to gain post the Twitch cut is going to charity (also no, VShojo was not supposed to gain anything of this, only her, Twitch and the charity).
It's similar to merch that has attached a portion going into donations (that she also did), since you can't really just sell the 100% because of production costs.
Is it "morally wrong"? Well only if you go into the mindset of not everything going to charity, but reality is, no she isn't scamming anyone because it is indicated what percentage is going and she isn't saying it is a subathon where 100% is going to charity.
Should have been 100%? I mean that's good and all, but at the same time, a month of working with no pay would be a really dumb move by anyone, even charities make some money back with fundraisers, mostly through sponsors.
