>>103288381>Consciousness of guilt because you have nothingThat's projection.
I have provided evidence that what was done was done in accordance to MC's policy 5.12.7, and Pixiv's 2024 policy, that eerily mirrors it, explicitly cites US and UK legislation.
Besides, what you have provided, by your logic, is association fallacy.
You've shown Vought's intent and identified his role within the CFPB and the OMB but failed to provide direct communiqués.
At best you can claim that Vought, within his capacity as the CFPB acting director, can carry out his stated agenda.
But, as stated before, neither he nor the CFPB is ever stated to be involved.
They're associated but without explicit links.
Hence everything you've said is conspiracy theories.
What I've revealed is irrefutable proof of either gross-negligence, apathy or worse.
Many aired their complaints then, even filing reports to relevant government agencies.
What's their response?
Nothing.
If you were honest, you'd have stated that Vought's inaction now and his ideology pertaining to pornography is evidence of him creating an environment wherein payment processors can act as they please on the matter, even moreso than Chopra and the Biden admin's silence.
Who was it again, in government, that championed and acted in ways to empower of women by valuing them based on merits rather than their physical attractiveness, and saw certain NSFW media as something that perpetuates 'prurient interests' measuring vulnerable people's worth based on their sexual attractiveness?
Is that to not a motive, though not as explicit as Vought's, which if addressed by government could lead to similar outcomes for porn?
>You produced an exhaustive listOf which you don't address nor acknowledge the prior admin's responsibility as those that govern.
