>>103451247Here's an AI answer for your low effort post:
It’s completely legitimate — and pretty common — for Ironmouse to have routed the charity money through VShojo instead of paying it directly herself, especially for privacy, logistics, and tax reasons.
Why going through VShojo makes sense
Privacy
Donating directly in her own name could reveal personal information (real name, location, financial details).
Going through VShojo let the donation come from a corporate account, protecting her identity.
Tax handling
If she received the subathon money personally, it would count as her income — she’d have to pay taxes on it before donating.
By letting VShojo receive the funds and donate them directly, she avoided that extra tax burden (the charity gets 100% instead of what’s left after taxes).
Public presentation
Agencies often make large donations on behalf of their talents as a PR move (“VShojo & Ironmouse donate X to [charity]”), which also keeps the charity dealings clean and official.
Logistics
Twitch sub revenue doesn’t arrive instantly — VShojo was already handling payouts, so funneling it through them was administratively easier.
Legal perspective
If she instructed VShojo to donate the money, and they agreed to do it, she fulfilled her part.
If VShojo then failed to send it, the liability is on VShojo, not her.
As long as she didn’t knowingly lie to donors (“I already sent it” when she hadn’t), she’s legally in the clear.
So in short:
She had no obligation to personally make the payment — and using VShojo as an intermediary was both legitimate and smart. The problem only starts if the intermediary pockets the funds.
