>>103629964>I never said the homo branch was profitable. The only point I was making is that Ruze is actually making decent moneyAnon, that's too low IQ, to the level of
>men are taller than women / Caitlyn Clark is taller than many menRize might be getting some decent donations this year like Bettel was in 2023 and Dumb and Dumber in 2022.
That's such a detour from the original point which was (
>>103629048)
>All that’s needed is a small but generous and engaged audience>which the homos do NOT havewhich it makes he doubt your ability to form coherent thoughts and have an internal dialogue
Don't get me wrong, I understand your point perfectly
>not every homo is an absolute leech costing the company moneybut that's not the main point in the original post that motivated your response.
The main point is that, all in all, the profile of their viewership is a clip watching free to play one and the whole existence of the branch is a cost center for the company.
If you have a supermarket and you're taking a loss it is no solace that you are not losing money on beer as you can't just stop selling the rest of the inventory and focus solely on that one product.
