>>104132686That’s true but that’s not what anon at
>>104132649 implied, which was
>all Holos could be successful following the same path taken by Ririkawhile the only reason she’s even getting the numbers she’s getting today is because the company she’s keeping and the content she’s streaming
>primarily targeting the typical Hololive audience>alongside the girls that stream content for the typical Hololive audience Anon at
>>104132669 had the right take: there is zero upside to deviate from the tried and trusted strat in search for a mythical “other audience” that is more than proven not to be there
>>104132706>because management nigger forced her eh, forced is too strong for what she herself construed as management whispering in her ears
>you can have a much stronger avenue for growth if you don’t limit your choice of collab partners That was ROTTEN for an advice but she didn’t have to take it. Actually, FlowGlow proved both that the opposite is true and that they don’t have to listen to management at all and can choose their own path
