>>104449851>because you already lost, through your own wordsWell if you think someone can "lose" just because he mocked an argument, then that's fine for you. It means you don't have anything else to show or argue. You just want to "win" afterall.
>>104449895> Enablers lose out by boosting others and weakening their own shine, while the exploiter stays stuck and hasn’t passed those who graduated months agoYou're just ignoring they're all on the same agency, this mindset is retarded when you're all coworkers.
Just because you want to collab doesn't mean you want to leech on. Also you're even ignoring that she got invited, so you're saying she's not the leecher, but the leeched? You don't even know what you're arguing about a this point.
>Excusing the need for collabs to survive just shows you are a retard schizo nigger manipulating bad behavior, you egoist. You, sociopath, need to study.This point shows you're talking with implications, not with the truth. You imply that she's collabing for "survive", while that's not a truth. Truth is she were in japan and her job was to do certain stuff, and those are shown through time. The reason behind this isn't important and neither you'll never know for sure. Implications and schizoposting aren't proof.
