>>104579605> you will just dismiss it as me "not getting it" you really didn't get it because the way you described that post is literally the kind of people that post is criticizing
>The kind of person who gets angry about prudes but also gets angry about women being sexually free, because in the end it was never about prudishness, it was about him and his fixation on porn and how he doesn't want his porn taken away from him. When the sex is not for him personally, suddenly he's the most puritan guy you've ever met. the post is literally criticizing people exactly like this. That anon is likely a nihilistic atheist without any particular moral standards who is taking his own athiestic hedonistic outlook to its logical conclusion and pointing out that if you are not religious then you have no actual moral framework to justify being prudish and being against women being sexual, you are a inconsistent hypocritical paradoxical person who performatively acts prudish when convenient and has conservative prudish ideas as your stated values as a left-over vestigial thing while being paradoxically a gooner hedonist yourself who doesn't live like a prude in any other regard. This is what that post is calling out. There are millions of wishy-washy incoherent people like this, here and far beyond even vtubing, and this is why that post is profound.
He is calling out that people are npcs with performative incoherent beliefes that contradict their own actions and that only someone who is actually religious with an actual religious moral foundation/belief system can coherently and convincingly make prudish criticisms of women like the vtubers being talked about here. The people mocking it are the exact kind of midwit npcs he was talking about who don't understand how lazy and incoherent their own stated beliefs really are.
