>>104676029>Businesses don’t keep sinking money into something with zero returnHaha good one anon. If you are being serious then no, businesses will set aflame millions for a "future prospec". The entire tech industry is notorious for this since it used to be easy to get investor capital from "projected growth" while the company itself has never made a profit. See also HoloEarth
>You don’t have to like them, but pretending you know the company’s balance sheet better than the people actually running it is just copeCover is a public company now so they have to give us the balance sheets. You might notice that all the financial status for the stars are conveniently bundled with the profitable business. You generally only do this if things are bad, otherwise you would loudly announce to your investors of the big numbers.
>As for “taking away resources from the girls” — that’s just a lazy talking pointYes, all the staff, studio time, and resources given over to the homos is not only better invested in the girls but giving them to the homos negatively affects the girls as their audience is incompatible with your primary audience. The primary audience is also openly hostile to the homos, and angering your primary demographic as evidenced in other businesses.
>And calling them “3views” while they consistently outperform the average indie male streamer by milesHololive is not a lemonade stand, being the best in the business and still achieving those results for after years shows that either there is no audience or that they have failed entice the one that exists. Either way best to split off the branch since it is not on the same playing field that Hololive has grown to.
>Holostars you call “irrelevant nobodies” still manage to live rent-free in your head.Of course, the fags don't earn enough to pay rent
