>>104745115Yeah, and both of those are not me bringing those sentiments or descriptive words up myself, but answering someone else, working based off his assumptions. Do you genuinely not understand that those aren't my ways of thinking, but just me leading a conversation, aka ACTUALLY FUCKING ANSWERING what somebody says instead of just twisting anything the other person says to be within your narrative, like you are doing right now? You, and that one anon who argues anything for no reason whatsoever (which I assume you are anyway kek) have cognitive biases out the wazoo to the point I think you are genuinely mentally ill, like incapable of reflecting on yourself anti-social mentally ill. Or retarded as shit. It's been pissing me off so much, because if I didn't see that you are doing this anytime over anything I would almost say it's ragebait, but you are just genuinely entirely incapable of actually approaching what people say with any semblance of rationality as soon as you feel attacked in the slightest way possible, aren't you? It's aggravating to look at, as soon as the conversation stops being a hugbox to the maximum possible degree it becomes entirely about being right, any attempt at understanding or reaching a consensus goes out the window.
