>>107316625>It shouldn't have taken evidence of my claims to get you to believe my otherwise unproven claimsNot a very sensible take, and all it takes is the least bit of evidence to back up your claims. I do however see there's still some dumb faggot *actually* coping about the whole thing still in denial, so the suspicion that evidence is futile does seem to have some merit.
>They hide behind perms because it can just mean that they shift the blame somewhere else and not take responsibility for it.Oh I've been around quite some time, and know more than a little about the type of shit Cover can get up to, but also the kind of shit companies providing perms can get up to, like demanding perms be re-applied every week, or paying a "fee". From Cover's side it's often just been mismanagement, people(aka management) being late in applying for perms etc.
>Your good faith in cover was completely misplacedPerhaps. I'd still be curious about why they'd not allow their talents to stream a (somewhat popular) new game. Though knowing what I know about JP business culture it might well be something as stupid as "some company Cover wants to stay friends with has some dumb beef with Ad Hoc". While this wasn't such an issue in the past (they were just fine streaming Palworld without worry over upsetting Nintendo) they've definitely gotten worse over the past few years.
