>>108263422The NDA she signed certainly has clauses that prevents her from "making Cover look bad".
A particular jewy lawyer will argue the case that streaming regularly on her new persona will cast a bad light on her previous employer.
That's stretch logic, I know. Lawyers do it anyway, they don't even need to file formal complaints. They can intimidate simply by sending Saba a strongly worded email to monitor her comments and to "take a break", wink wink.
Hell It doesn't even have to be Cover itself. It could be some schitzo pretending to be a lawyer representing Cover.