>>108602400it's not a schizopost. You are either being dishonest or genuinely unaware that leftists are as I described them there. I have consumed a lot of leftist content, seen how they act and read about things that they believe like critical theory, historical materialism etc and seen their 'rules for radicals' which explains their tactics.
Leftists are literally exactly as schizophrenic as described in their worldview and the way in which they approach politics and understanding this about them explains everything they do from the grand scale policy positions that clash against reality or the minutiae of the way in which they argue and interact with others mundanely on twitter or on discord.
To understand a leftoid, there are basically 3 main things which crucially explain all of their behavior and the way they view the world and argue about things
1. they think that engaging in politics on any level is a MORAL act in and of itself; that doing or saying anything relating to politics is a form of engaging in morality (this explains the virtue signalling and why it is so compulsory to them, as well as the extreme purity testing and the unending constant moral outrage and why they think moral indignation and labelling with isms is a moral act in and of itself and that doing so is necessary)
2. they view people not as individuals but as part of collective groups and because of point 1. this means that they view the individuals as all being advocates of said collective groups at all times and so any action done by the individual is also the act of the collective group itself, and so if the collective group advocates or has done a thing then the individual has also done it (this explains everything from the concept of white guilt, their oppression hierarchies, the dynamics of oppressor-oppressed, the constant whataboutism as justification for behavior against the enemy, aligning themselves with people who are an existential threat to them merely due to class group characteristics etc)
3. they think the beliefs of all ideological opponents are beliefs but that their own beliefs are objective facts of reality and also inevitable (this is from their Marxist materialist analysis of history where they think trends in history are inevitable social forces and that history has an arc to it; this explains their total unshakeable confidence in their beliefs and how nigh impossible it is to argue with them about anything and how they always act so overly indignant and frustrated at being challenged or alternately smug and elistist because they think, ironically, that their worldview is the de facto common sense view of reality and everyone else is an insane deluded ideologue or just too low iq to grasp reality and if only all the proles and normies could just be educated enough then they would agree with them)
