>>10931481I feel like we already went through this already. Hmmm, let me try and rephrase it so I can see what's so familiar about it.
>right, my bad, i forgot to include the actions of real violence as part of it because i was more so focused on getting across the point then filling in all the possible actions that school shooters could do. but its a given, of course id report a threat if i found evidence on a neighbors computer or whatever. >just because i failed to mention it doesnt invalidate my overall point of psychos arent school shooters so gamers arent either.but school shooters and gamers are very much related and are only separated by one word, fictional.
>if you remove fictional from the meaning of GTA Players, its the same definition as psychopath.thats why normies or anti-games people are against it because fictional isnt enough of a barrier to separate them.
Ah, I see. Just some Jack Thompson fag trying to stop me from enjoying my harmless recreational activities.
>S-stop trying to conflate the tw-Quiet faggot. You don't even know what you're talking about, jesas fucking christ. Both porn and video games primarily use dopamine receptors to keep you engaged and to keep you coming back. In fact, it's what is firing off in your brain the most. and it's what's showing the most activitity. Video Games and Porn are a lot more linked than you think. Not only is it fictional, but both brings lots of pleasure for the common person. It's the reason why you can even get addicted to it in the first place. Cope.
>B-but it's still "children"No it's not. It's not children in the same vein that me killing NPCs and faggot sand niggers in Insurgency are not "people". They do not and will not ever be counted as the same thing. I'd also argue that for otaku and hard weebs actually do not look at lolis as children real or fictional, but more so as just the term loli itself. The Iconography of Loli has evolved so much so that just referring to Loli as, children, petite women, dwarves, or goblins is massively reductionists and completely misses the the nuances and complexitity of what makes Loli, "Loli". Of course, normalfags and ironic weebs do not surround themselves in the culture too much so they can't actually see the abstract concept and idea of "Loliness" of the loli and can only see the real world equivalents and what those characters can try to match to in their limited normalfag understanding (again, children, petite women, drawves, etc.). A simple case of semiotics. The Icon (loli) and the signal (real word equivalents).
In any case non of this shit even matters. No normalfag or interweb autist should even try and stifle the creators of a piece of artwork. Both video games and doujins deserve their place in this world because it is someone's speech. Tht speech and expression should be protected at all costs. These things are not illegal in my country, but if it was I wouldn't care. I would still continue to consume, interact, and engage with the material however I see fit. I will create and distribute such material however I see fit. Any and all attempts to stop me will be met with hostility. for it is an attack not only against me ,but all facets of freedom of speech.
>Ok, but you're still a pedoCope, retard. That or project harder. I don't have sexual thoughts about children in my neighborhood or will children across the world. In the same vein that I'm no psychopath or more prone to violence because I play violent video games. If you still have a problem try seething.
