>>109209746>So yes, it comes back to them being cowards where they won't take common sense actions that is zero risk, all rewardYou’re tying yourself into completely bizarre and unsubstantiated beliefs where occam’s razor should just apply. You’re whole Biden psychoanalysis is just a fairy tale where you assume his administrations’ mindset with no real evidence in order to prove your beliefs about Trump, this would also mean Obama’s implicit in the same dealings too, at this point, you couldn’t make a case for any competent leadership on the entirety of planet earth considering they’ve all been under the hegemon of a nation that just freely hands over power to their enemies even if they have a full proof trump card, its ridiculous. Yes Trump is not releasing everything about Epstein. Yes, every president who has ever existed in our lifetimes is in the same way covering up details about 9/11, the MLK files, the JFK files, MK Ultra, Freemasonry, and so on. This doesn’t immediately mean the most tin foil hat explanation is true, this simply means that the leaders are most likely operating under morally agnostic utilitarian ethics as a result of modernist philosophies or perhaps, as you said, cowardice. Basically, you haven’t actually demonstrated any of your claims you’ve merely asserted them.
> Now do you agree we need someone who will immediately prosecute everyone on the epstein list and current administrationWhen you ask an “ought”, a “need” you have to first define a moral framework where “oughts” can be gotten from otherwise discussion is meaningless. My answer is yes, of course, in the sense that it would be the best course of outcome, but no in the sense that life continues on and the purpose of life can still be fulfilled even if the entire world is filled with evil, sometimes this could even make the purpose of life easier to attain. I’m curious in your epistemic justification for this answer though, seeing that you come off as a post-modern materialist who has no objective grounding for “need” claims.
