>>12365527>Lies upon lies upon liesAgain, point them out. Literally name one.
>When you read between the lines, it's the truthAnon,
>>12362427 confirmed that she has admitted it on stream, confirming my assumption in
>>12361224.
To make it even more clear, "effectively admitted" =/= "admitted". When listening to the stream, it was apparent, to me at least, that toe cracking wasn't the only thing that happened, maybe not with the specific individual in the story, but any other man her mother brought. Therefore, I thought it was safe to assume she was molested. Well, that incident in and of itself could be considered molestation but anyway.
Therefore, yes, I have at least one instance where I have successfully read between the lines. You, however, have zero so far.
As I said before, not my fault you don't have the aptitude for it.
