>>12662522>>12663603You're both wrong. It's simply a matter of whether there's enough good publicity in banning a canceled person from all streaming platform. It doesn't matter whether or not they've flagrantly violated the TOS. After all, Twitch has a do not ban under any circumstance list for the explicit reason of protecting some streamers over others from TOS enforcement. If the technical analysis shows you'd make a good sacrifice to the volcano mob then there is no going back to streaming.
Honestly, women don't understand what it's like to be a male streamer. You whores are the same ones who say that any guy can go on tinder and get a date if they shower and groom themselves well, while only swiping DO WANT on only the guys who also happen to have Adonis genes and chiseled jawlines.
>>12662450Good is subjective. I'd only watch one that made me money buy shilling cryptos I invest in, or one that catered to my massively undeserved niche with a professional quality performance.
