>>1317013>Why mention pessimism if you're not insulting him for his behavior?You must be autistic because I quite literally just explained how I was criticising him extending his own pessimism into a belief that everyone else is the same as him, and not criticising the idea of being pessimistic itself.
>I thought you had principles you adhere to, which would mean you don't engage in the same type of behavior as someone you dislike? Oh shit, I breathe the same air as someone I dislike, I guess that makes me a hypocrite. No wait, that's not what hypocrisy is, and you're a retard who has to twist the meaning of words to try and make someone look bad in an argument.
>I don't agree with your premise that hypocrisy is always entirely detestable. Hypocrisy is absolutely detestable and you're a double retard for thinking otherwise.
>I don't even get what you're trying to say here or why you want to group people into "good" or "bad" like an autistIt's hard to make it any more simple, when reducing things to "good" and "bad" was already a simplification for the sake of making it understandable for you. If person A criticises person B for doing X, which is bad, it doesn't matter one bit what kind of person A is, because even if A is bad for doing Y, which is also bad, that does not stop B from being bad for doing X. It simply means both A and B are bad people doing bad things. Even a hypocrite is not wrong to call out someone for their hypocrisy being worthy of condemnation, for being a hypocrite themselves would not make the other person's hypocrisy any more acceptable. I do not know how I can simplify this any further for you. Attempting to insult me by twisting my words does nothing to make Nyanners any less of a hypocrite, it just makes you a fanboy who doesn't understand how to argue.