>>13769461See now we're getting to a weird place. Aside from the fact that anime is so highly stylized that making a 1:1 connection with reality is borderline schizophrenic, you're muddying the waters about why something is wrong in the first place by fixating on what essentially boils down to an arbitrary checklist of characteristics that you can't really justify as being wrong in and of themselves.
For instance, if it were up to me, I'd say that anyone who prefers fully-shaved pubes to hairy is one or has tendencies. But obviously that's not the case, and considering the really creepy push for it in IRL media I'm in the minority of thinking it's weird.
What about flat women? Short women? Women with high pitched voices? What if they have a combination of some of those traits? What if they had all but one? What if they had all of them? How many marks on your checklist need to pass? What if someone else has a different checklist or a different threshold? What makes them a better or worse arbiter than you?
The fundamental issue is the predatory nature and sexual excitement arising from violating the consent of others, particularly underdeveloped minds, and that's
the danger. I just don't see how your way of looking at things is useful. You could define things that way, but how is that helpful in ethical determination? I'd consider someone like the janny in the OP to be a predator based on
>>13769324 even though they're lusting after a group that would pass the physical checklist you're running off of.
