>>15046761Raw intelligence has about as much to do with knowledge as being tall has to do with playing basketball.
>>15046874It is even higher for a Japanese female, as Japanese aggregate more towards the mean score to begin with.
>>15047629You reach close to your peak in your teens, but I.Q. continues to barely increase until you're about 26 if male, or 22 if female, coincidentally when the brain is finished maturing. From there, the composition of your sub-scores and corresponding mental abilities redistribute, but the decline is so minute that by the time you are 45 years old, in a vacuum, you will have the same I.Q. as when you were age 19. The precipitous decline associated with age alone begins in your 60s. Stop smoking pot.
>>15047945This. 130 is the absolute baseline for even the most modest intelligence of the level corresponding to any sort of "genius," but still dangerously close to midwittery. Anyone with an I.Q. of 130 who tells you they are suffering from a communication gap is just inept socially, or pessimistic, 130 is the social optimum for success. Beyond 145, you may start to encounter actual genius, and the meme'd loneliness associated with it.
>>15048135Think about all the people who don't post their scores. Also know that people tend to group up with other people at their level of cognitive ability in virtually all social domains. If you're bright, you're going to be disproportionately exposed to other bright people, and it will become normalized to you.
>>15048268Find the most normie people you know and give them the Mensa Norway test, then prepare to feel guilty and stunned by what they don't just intuit.
