>>15834091Well, watching again she does say more than 10 years. So 22 (or 23/24 not) is the lowest end, but you're right that it's probably at least a few years older
Not sure where Wikipedia got 2011 though. The earliest works listed on her site are some small things from 2013-2015. So if she got those at 18 or even 17 (which would be impressive, but not unreasonable) then she'd be around 26sh right now, and I can see that.
