>>16360401>At most she gets the other 35%Out of the stuff that uses Youtube processing, of course.
But you can assume she would get a full 50% of the sponsored streams, third party merchandise and partnership proceeds plus a bigger cut than of the merchandise she herself produces (because she fronts the cost and the risk).
Anon here
>>16360011 mentioned an important point too
>she has to manage all that shit on her own time, tooIt's a tradeoff. If she values the time she spends self managing at a lower rate than the cut she paid to get someone else to do the bureaucratic part of all of it then, yes, she would be ahead if what she earns now is above 50% of her total earnings on Hololive.
But if she doesn't then the tradeoff is not longer financial but about whatever else.
