>>20409228Lolicons not having the same views on loli is understandable. By simply believing that loli is a bunch of concepts and ideas bounded together by a rope of cute and funny, it is no wonder you have such wild ideas of loli. I remember Comic LO stated that Loli could be a lot of things and it means different things to other people. This is the reason why Anti-Lolicons and Pedophile lolicons are so fixated on the idea and concept of "chjld" when thinking of loli. Lolicons in general have so much leeway into thinking what loli appeals to them. People like "petite women". Other people are obsessed with "cuteness and innocence". Other Lolicons are fixated with "moe". I know a few who love the "contrast" especially apparent in lolibabas. And again, some lolicon are simply in it for "children".
These are all legitimate reasons to like lolicon. It is because of these reasons why the definition of loli should strictly be body type and not other personality traits. This way, we keep all the unique interactions and novel concepts while excluding literally everything else. The devilish curves of petite women and the taboo washboard look of a child are both loli. The added benefit of a lady slouching about resting from work hoping for action is as much of a tacked on setting as the curious little girl wanting to help her brother any way they can.
The personality of loli and the setting in which they are presented is only a means to an end for loli in it's entirety. The body type is what matters most.
Matsuri shouldn't let her likeness for innocent girls asking for corruption to blind her to what loli truly is.
