[161 / 10 / 96]
Quoted By: >>21248183 >>21248794 >>21248954 >>21249233 >>21252101 >>21257548 >>21264816 >>21269742 >>21273971
https://p2y.jp/tokyo-district-court-approves-plaintiffs-request-for-information-disclosure-in-a-trial-in-which-vtubers-fight-each-other/
>On March 28, 2022 (4th year of Reiwa), the Tokyo District Court said that virtual YouTuber (VTuber) Yuzuki Roa (affiliation: Nijisanji), in which the plaintiff woman acts as a performer/voice model, “teased a junior”. In the court case against the defendant (connector on the other party's VTuber side) who released the video of the content to be done, it was found that the plaintiff's complaint was accepted and the other party's VTuber's information disclosure was approved.
>In addition, the complaint that the defendant demanded dismissal, such as "The character and the plaintiff are different entities and cannot be identified," will be rejected.
https://twitter.com/ozawakazuhito/status/1508368681184927746
>This ruling goes into the previously unclear legal "identity of VTuber talent and performer/voice model", and "defamation of VTuber talent is to the performer/voice model who serves it. "It can be considered that it is recognized as" identical to defamation". Therefore, if this decision is finalized, it will have a great impact on the entire VTuber industry in the future.
>On March 28, 2022 (4th year of Reiwa), the Tokyo District Court said that virtual YouTuber (VTuber) Yuzuki Roa (affiliation: Nijisanji), in which the plaintiff woman acts as a performer/voice model, “teased a junior”. In the court case against the defendant (connector on the other party's VTuber side) who released the video of the content to be done, it was found that the plaintiff's complaint was accepted and the other party's VTuber's information disclosure was approved.
>In addition, the complaint that the defendant demanded dismissal, such as "The character and the plaintiff are different entities and cannot be identified," will be rejected.
https://twitter.com/ozawakazuhito/status/1508368681184927746
>This ruling goes into the previously unclear legal "identity of VTuber talent and performer/voice model", and "defamation of VTuber talent is to the performer/voice model who serves it. "It can be considered that it is recognized as" identical to defamation". Therefore, if this decision is finalized, it will have a great impact on the entire VTuber industry in the future.
