>>22972739Ok faggot, I'll prove to you scientifically that ass is superior than tits
>woman has titsDelicious
>woman has no tits Delicious
>woman has assDelicious
>woman has no assUNGODLY ABORTION OF NATURE
Hence, with this simple objective data we can reach the following conclusion:
The abscense or presence of tits is irrelevant when determining the quality of a female, hence the value of tits is minimal since the attractiveness won't be affected as much objectively, and hence only subjective judgement will be the determining factor when rating each instance of tits no matter the size.
Meanwhile, women with no ass are so disgusting that it makes me want to drink fuel just to throw myself of a skyscraper just to ignite myself midair. Assless anominations are ostracized and excluded from the gene pool, thus making the presence of ass a relevant factor with objective value. It's so important that just by not having ass it creates an eldritch horror even Lovecraft would be afraid of writing about. The objective and subjective value of ass is superior in any metric when compared to tits, which means without a shadow of a doubt that ass > tits.
tl;dr you're wrong and your mom is a whore. 
