>>23352345You're gonna have to prove with more than one survey on furrymingle or whatever that women rate men lower than men rate women on average by a "huge fucking mile". If you're going ti argue for stats then use better stats. Also,
>>23352647 my point was that it doesnt matter if women are more picky about looks, because you're still picky about looks. Why do you guys think you're so above women just because she would reject 70% of men based on looka and you would only reject 50% of women based on looks? You guys are not any better just because you're less picky. Men are way more picky about women about age for obvious reasons but to you guys, that's totally fine, right? It's only when women are picky about something that affects you that it matters, right? Fuck off.
>>23352647You don't have to be a chad to get with women. Call me beta buxx, call me bluepilled, cope seethe, whatever. If you think you need to be chad to have a chance then you're going to stay a virgin, have fun. Please understand that the word salad you wrote to defend your defeatism will not ever help you. I'd rather you lift a single weight and take a single shower than read any more papers about mate competition and transhumanist liberalism. Unironically touch grass.
>>23352949No, you wouldn't. Well, maybe you would, but once you have sex you'll realize it's not worth your desperation like that. You have to give up this idea that sex is gonna save you, someday you're gonna trip into a vagina and realize that nothing has changed about you except that you're not a virgin.
>>23354384Different genders are picky about different things. There are basically no men who date a 50 year old woman at 25 whereas that's far more common for women (though still extremely rare).
