>>2614475>Which you did in the previous post.False, you need to prove you aren't a tourist, you aren't doing that.
>Which you also did not provide.Yes I did, gain some reading comprehension.
>Which you also did.False, I had both context and foundation for finding out twitterspeak, you chose random terms with none of that, then tried to imply you can somehow "fit in" too much, falseflagging in an evident attempt to glamourise not fitting in and using twitterspeak tourist lingo instead.
>I understand you may not yet be at the age where reading is a necessary skill, but please do put some effort into improving."Newfag" is the founding source for that suffix, not a derivative of it. Gain some reading comprehension.
