>>26143011idk, I don't analyse languages. Here's a sample of some of the numbers around her though:
(video, daily_view_difference, mentions)
('wkm4Nwpf-80', 20639, 1)
('ww1DfXDM4Dk', 21778, 1)
('aTLSQfeAPsw', 22472, 1)
('y0t1P8vYTnI', 23386, 23)
('kCBQBNMPa4c', 23981, 1)
('51G0VKR8_jA', 24387, 1)
('ESKKppMk_eI', 24570, 1)
('3M5vWGK-q0E', 24707, 1)
('P56PIzq3pe4', 27250, 1)
('OjYd95lLcik', 28008, 1)
('lEHXr49Z6xg', 31498, 17)
('6xsNiDVzkrU', 31983, 1)
('YHagMJqVxAQ', 36017, 1)
('2iPEdr3TG9Q', 41568, 1)
('eDC3k_pueRg', 67591, 1)
('mUeJOBG0jiE', 88377, 1)
('meIkcnZghEo', 103166, 2)
('TjN8C8m5bcM', 155374, 2)
('0K2wijLs3wo', 166040, 1)
('ddgdq-K3jHs', 190043, 1)
View count is divided by mentions if multiple talents are involved, as to not inflate the graph. However it does have the side-effect of favouring those who can do solo clips, rather than double the amount in a duo, or 3-6 times in a collab.
There is also the thing about clippers and their description habits. I have encountered a few that tag a bucket of channels or a generation regardless of the clip itself; but it is a detail I don't care too much for, as the way to fix it is case-by-case.
Otherwise, she has a lot of clips that get small amounts of views, which adds up fast. 439 clips are above +100 views for example, and 184 above +1000. You can infer the actions of her viewerbase, but it is likely that they are riding the recommendation wave and viewing a lot of clips back-to-back.
