>>2791603Okay smoothbrain. Let me break your own retardation down for you. I can't possibly make it anymore simple than this.
This is logic you're asking to believe:
1. Matsuri is abusing her fellow employees.
2. This is cultural acknowledged as abuse and accepted as such by those employees and the Japanese culture.
Yet despite this.
3. They talk about this openly with no expectations of any response (from people who you say recognise it as abuse) from either the public nor their fellow employees. In a company well known for curbing and trying to avoid controversy that makes the company look bad no less.
4. And indeed there is no outcry or response - either from the public (who we're supposed to believe share your definition of abuse) or from the company known to protect people from this.
5. After this, most of the people she abused are completely fine with her in most of their posterior interactions showing no further signs of any discomfort being around her or interacting with her.
This is transparantly absurd.
The truth is you're just unable to accept (or perhaps just comprehend) that you're enforcing a western definition of abuse on a country and culture in which it doesn't exist. There is a clear dileation between what Matsuri is doing and what a creepy old man would do that would garner the response and indignation that you're so indignant that Matsuri doesn't receive. Clearly an old man would warrant such a response - because their is an obvious difference between him and Matsuri.
Also the closer skin-ties of females isn't even just a Japanese things. It is far more normal even in western culture for women to touch each other more and sometimes even 'fool around' - hence the proliferation of temporary bisexuality amongst females (which I can find for you) or even just cultural reflections such as that song by Katy Perry et al.
tl;rd Matsuri is based and you don't have to fear anything from her (because you'll never be a woman).
