>>2911210you sure did, in the same way calling white people racist is not an argument, calling people schizos for not supporting censorship is also not an argument.
>>2911134>There's a direct and obvious connection between paying for a membership and what the streamer gets in their pay the next monthlets assume this is true, now this would make sense if it was someone like marine/gura complaining who can take a membership subtraction hit of 100s. dont you think it would be better for risu to get more publicity rather than censoring people who share her content.
>>2911240>not participate in itshould've left it at that. why are you trying to control people who are is my question? why cant you just "leave it alone" for people to "do what they want" and "i'll do what I want". why the authoritative nature on this content?
>>2911478>Because I don't shit into the hand of the person feeding mesorry what? it wasnt a big issue until risu made it. it was silent, until you started damage controlling for her and brought this to light.
>Your pirating has direct influence on the content and atmosphere of future member streams.again, the people who like the content should've been silent and be on their way rather than make a big fuss about it because they think they deserve risu's content which they paid for but the other anon who paid for who shared it doesnt deserve to. I am really only seeing one side being elitist here and its not the sharing one.
the anons who share dont touch her chat, arent toxic, they're just sharing amongst themselves, you got too elitist because you paid for it and are too insecure to understand not everyong likes censorship
>t. Non-member who doesn't piratethis is not a site where appealing to authority works like twitter/reddit does, you trying this trick is useless here.
