>>3150527Youtube has an average "like" engagement of 3.4%, meaning 3.4% of people who watch a whole video and generally like the content enough to watch another video will actually "like" the video; with 10% being almost impossible to achieve even with a small engaged audience and the youtuber begging for likes.
To give you an idea, she did a members only poll last Halloween, with 9k votes for what video to watch but only 2k likes on the video. and we know 9k isn't all her members (and this was back around 1m membership)
easily 2/3 of the chat in any of her videos live are members, including tonight's unarchived karaoke, with 35-40k live viewers; if you figure 2/3 veiwers tonight were members that gives you an absolute min number of members at 22k, but we know not all her members watched, in fact judging by her video view rates, only 1/20 of the final views usually occur live, meaning she could be over 400k members on the high end.
I think that 400k number insanely unlikely, and it would indicate poor engagement for members which should be the most engaged of her viewers, I suspect the actual members numbers to be in the 40-80k range. this would produce about the 2-5k likes she gets on her members only streams (assuming 3-5% like engagement).
Assuming all those members are $5 not $10 she makes a min of 200k per month in membership (as high as 400k) before taxes, youtube and cover's cut.
