>>32695598I don't think that Lily's model is aesthetically outstanding, merely technically so; and in that rank there are a few similar, other indies whose names escape me.
>the kind of personality she hasI'm not sure how to treat this argument. I do feel like her model fits her personality, but that doesn't make the model strong aesthetically, in its own right. Although, I suppose the way in which a model is used affects its aesthetic qualities--I am reminded now of the picture of Rosemi in Selen's model, which looks entirely different. And, again, comparison needs must be made between useful or usable aesthetics and the aesthetics of abstract design. For here, note Ina's new model (the really fancy one) and Polka's complicated designs--both of which are aesthetically pleasing, but to a degree such that they would be more enjoyable as artwork than as actual designs, their complicated designs being too much for the actual usability of the model. But even given these shondoless reservations, her model is still a little sparse, (although I am perhaps spoiled for choice.) Her neck and wrist ribbons are a good example of this. Their existence is the soul point of their aesthetic functionality, as they are without further explication on the theme of their natures. The dress is also somewhat simple, especially is that is really the major point of her outfit (although that is rather an obvious comment).
