>>33122048>>33124655Corporate backing isn't a debuff. I mean, she's literally owned by Sony. The best case scenario is that she theoretically has the entirety of their resources, assets, connections, licenses and IP library at her disposal. Sony. As in Sony, the Playstation and Funimation company. Sony. I can't even fathom how Sony vtubers could be complete dogshit unless Sony was actively trying to sabotage their own investments. Sony.
Just imagine how hard Sony would have to try to fail for one of its vtubers to fail. Sony. The holy grail of backers. A multinational multimedia company with its dick in everything from hardware to software to gaming consoles to games to movies to music. Sony. What I'm trying to say is, the only way a Sony vtuber can possibly fail is if the company itself gives zero fucks and just has them for le ebin virtual youtuber meme. Sony.
I mean, they literally has a massive enough dick to guarantee a steady stream of content and permissions. Sony. The company whose revenue is supposedly 88 billion to Cover's measly 5 million. Sony. I just want to emphasize the point that if a Sony vtuber isn't crushing the competition, it's probably just because they're grossly underutilized by the company. Sony.
Honestly, I don't even understand why they don't have product tie ins. For example they have phones. Why not make some phones to shill? Why not make something else for them to shill? When you literally have a bunch of shills at your disposal, not having them shill your shit seems like a complete waste. This is the real problem. Sony and its subsidiaries don't seem to have a well put together plan to make the most use out of their vtubers, and at this point it's literally a joke how irrelevant they are in light of the fact that they're Sony.
