>>3394857>You're a retard.Insulting me won't get you anywere.
>You deflect all criticism of Kiara by claiming they're just "opinions"I did acknowledge the fact that she has flaws before though.
>then turn around and say that it's incorrect to say Kiara doesn't have good points.Because it is incorrect - in my opinion.
>If Kiara not having good points is a mere opinionYes.
>then so is the idea she DOES have good pointsYes? I never said anything opposed to that. I merely challenged your claim that she does not have any good points, which she, again, does - in my opinion.
>which means I'm correct and Kiara does not have any objective good points.No. You're incorrect because you claim your opinion of Kiara having no good points whatsoever is an objective, provable fact (Where is the proof you promised, by the way?)
>Do you really want to play this game pseudNo, I don't.
>or is it time to just give up your little semantic word gamesI am not the only one of us playing semantic games, but if you so will, I will stop. Under the condition that you do as well and stop claiming that 'Kiara is a shithead' is an objective fact.
>and admit that Kiara has objectively broken down crying multiple times over numbers, is rude, displays very little to no tact, is awful in group collabs because of her lack of social grace and is just an outright dumb and nasty person.Once more, this is an opinion.
>Deny it all you want the way she behaves is all the proof you need So you didn't even watch her recently, that is good to know. In other words, your opinion might be outdated.
> and any argument about it just being "opinion" is shitty cope.Well, then it seems we're both coping. Me because Kiara is apparently a shitty person (which I do not believe) and you because you think her being a shitty person is a fact.
