>>3383645>Sounds like a copeno, the math has been done a number of times by numberfags. it works out like this
Gura has provably a min of 20k paying memberships (as in we can confirm a min of 20k live views for some of her member content based on likes); the real number of paid memberships could be (based on youtube statistics) as high as 200k; however this number is almost as unlikely as her having just 20k. Based on youtube stats, and some statistical sampling her actual number of paid memberships is most likely somewhere around 40-80k.
Her paid memberships come in two tiers, 5 per month and 10 per month. We have no way to know how many of her paid memberships are 5 and how many are 10; so all estimates for income assume all paid memberships are $5 to provide a min estimated income. This min income could be significantly lower then reality though.
at 40k paid memberships for $5/mo she makes a min of $200k/mo from the memberships alone, if that number is 80k paid memberships her membership income is as high as $400k per month.
even if you don't believe the statistical models used, and only believe the bare minimum provable numbers (9k confirmed paid members who voted on a pole in october; numbers from before she hit 1mil subs) she's still making a min of $50k/mo on paid memberships; which equals her estimated ad revenue though youtube and equals her estimated monthly superchat revenue. However the statistical models easily prove her number of paid memberships are much much higher then this 9k number, with the floor being a min of 20k, though even that number is pretty much assuming nearly historically high and impossible to match youtube engagement in her video content for her memberships. furthermore in live content such as yesterday's costume reveal, 9 in 10 comments in her chat are membershrimp, with nearly 200k live viewers (don't believe me, the view is up with the chat comments, count it yourself when the costume is being revealed with the highest live numbers, nearly every post in chat has a green name meaning they're paid numbers, 200k live viewers and nearly every single comment comes from a paid membership; which lends credibility to the statistical models that suggest it's entirely possible she has 200k paid members; I don't believe it, if you believe the traffic was mostly passive, then you won't either, but we know at least 100k of her live viewers were ACTIVE and passionate, as they were waiting before the reveals, and stayed after it, and still chat was entirely a wall of green member names with a rare white (unpaying) post interspersed from time to time. Meaning that estimated 40-80k membership number might be conservatives.
