>>34618347No, AI are not sophisticated enough to come up with original concepts or ideas. As such it will remain garbage.
>>34618365I love this, the complete misunderstanding of art as something that needs to be "nice" looking. AI art is shit, not because it can't make pretty pictures but because it doesn't say anything. There's no mind behind it, no meaning to glance from it, digging into it will leave you with an empty void.
AI is worthless because it is inhuman. AI art when applied in a specific context can be considered art, but the shit that is being churned out by the AI art "community" is just meaningless, worthless, garbage. A fucking Garfield comic has more meaning than AI art, the fucking shit scribble you made as a kid has more value than AI art.
