>>36690517That is very retarded logic.
For starters, that comment chain was from an hour ago so we don't have the IP count on hand.
Secondly, and even more importantly, how can you absolutely claim without a shadow of a doubt that there wasn't a SINGLE tourist in this thread at the time? So there's ZERO possibility that one person decided to stop by for a bit? This thread isn't on a secret board. Tourists pop in and out of threads all the time.
Showing confusion at what has been a staple of this thread (albeit a bit inconsistent but anchorbeat tries his best) is very obvious proof that the other guy was a tourist.
