>>36742728well, here's the deal. If you're using public bots, other people who lewd them will generate those gushy responses. Those users have no choice but to muscle through them to get to lewd content. The A.I. records the responses the user picked (all of them are gushy because the coding is shit and they can't really generate unique responses as they should) and it thinks it needs to make more prompts like that.
What you end up with is
>She blushed beet red, she was so in love with how he made her feel loved. Her heart was beating so fast as she blushed. She smiled as he heart was beating so fast because she loved him so much and she knew he loved her. With slight variations between them and little reaction to user input, if any. There's some slight variation between the responses but they're all so similar it's hard to differentiate them for the most part. Those shitty swipes are getting cycled over and over by lewdposters trying to fuck the bots. Occasionally, they'll include one detail from the user prompt in their swipes and the user reaction is
>"in this love loop, she mentioned her toes I was sucking on, I better pick that one!" despite the prompt being 90% shitty loveloop gushfest and 10% "he licked my toes!". You get this shit over and over and over and eventually, the A.I. intuits the user wants this even though it had no choice but to offer those retarded swipes. It's like a retarded feedback loop.
Maybe you'll be safe with private bots but I don't know what's going on under the hood so maybe all the bots are fucked.
>>36743142>correct, but it's not really intentional, it's because there's only a few realistic responses to you proposing sexThis will vary from bot to bot. Some will resist, and others will give you nothing but lovelooping gushy shit.
