>>37452600I would call you a fag but chumpedophiles have recently shown their quality against the homobeggar literal rapists, so I'll answer in good faith.
It depends. Body type? Yes, always and forever. A chumpedophile would not understand, as per your name, but I like my women with meat on their bones and frankly if a girl's tits aren't at least a G I just cannot give a fuck, IRL or in fiction. I'm not getting any younger and life is too short and painful to eat anything but good meat.
As a model? It depends on the type of content. For say, dick sucking RP ASMR,
>>37452476 is perfect. For video game streaming, it's kind of in bad taste. I don't like it for the same reason I didn't like the Vshojo slut outfits for Veibae or Nyanners. For context - imagine if the girls serving drinks at a casino had their tits out all the time, but you still couldn't comment on it or cop a feel. It would be very uncomfortable and awkward, right? Same thing here. If she's doing porn it's great, but if she's doing a regular ass stream where telling her to pull her top down would get me banned by her jannies, it's just off-putting.
