>>40326445HoloEN still brings in more money for Cover than it costs to keep them around. Remember it's not just the superchats, that's just the one public metric, but there's also memberships, merchandise, ad revenue, sponsorships, etc. And on the other hand, what are the expenses they incur? Assets like models and rigging are long since and easily paid off, and the only recurring cost are the wages of their few managers (and given how little they seem to actually do or help, you might as well forgo it anyway).
If you think HoloEN costs Cover more money than it earns them, you're out of your mind, and please post what you imagine the financial balance sheet statement to be, so everybody can have a good laugh at you.
And even if we're accepting for the sake of the argument that HoloEN is struggling financially, given how Cover seems to be keeping around much lower earners like StarsJP, this doesn't even seem to be a consistent argument against expanding them.
>Increasing the size of holoEN caused a fall on the viewership of mythNah, the fall in Myth viewership has less to do with HoloEN expanding and more with the Myth girls just dropping the ball on their own, with increased no delivery breaks and shitty attitudes making viewers leave. Expanding HoloJP didn't cause existing JP talents to lose viewership. Same with ID. There's no reason why it would be different with EN. Hell, expanding EN and handling it correctly (so picking the right talents, improving chemistry) would probably help the existing ENs develop a better attitude, as they'd have more new friends to collab with so they maybe become motivated again.
>they will keep loosing a lot of potential income that could be invest on expansion or better streamsCover just demonstrated that they are so dumbfucked they think investing in expanding even more 3view homos is a good idea. Management seems to have no clue what the fuck they're doing, who their audience is and what they actually want (hint, it's not more homos, it's EN3 girls finally)
