>>40472031>We have neural networks that can perform singular tasks within certain set parametersFalse. Look into DeepMind for example.
>You think a chat bot that can converse with humans is equivalent to the complete computing power of a human brain?No. I already shown that computing power of an average rat's brain is enough for them to converse with humans at the current level.
>fine motor functionNothing special. Humans have it because their neural networks are being trained with motor function since birth.
>what about the million other things our brains do dailyJust a simple processing of audial, visual, tactal and other inputs of human body. Nothing special. We've seen similar with current neural networks.
>We don't have NEARLY enough computing power to simulate a full human brain yet.We had long ago. What we don't have yet is suitable and optimized architecture
>If we could even train a single AI to perform 2 simultaneous large tasks that would be a featOnce again, look into DeepMind
>I tried to keep it in layman terms so your AIbro brain could handle it.This statement (well, and all you wrote previously too) instantly shown that you don't know shit about AI and came here just to shitpost
