>>44525515It's difficult to learn something you imagine you already know.
Most likely, they imagine that the normal person uses integrated graphics, and even having a discrete graphics card at all means that you are in the top 0.1% of gamers even if that card is a 1060. Because why would the 1060 exist as a separate product if it was useless for most gamers? People probably spend on really expensive cards because they're uber-hardcore and playing some super raytraced games on their 4K monitor at 300fps competitively, right? The price itself indicates that it can't be that useful, because who would spend that much?
Take the average gamer for example. They don't spend their time wondering about what the RTX A6000 brings to the table for gaming because an A6000 costs 4.5K USD, and if popular games required this, nobody would be playing them. They happen to be right in this case, but in the case that your price threshold for a card is lower at like 500 USD, it's easy to come to the wrong conclusion with the same reasoning. That's why their chat needs to bring them around to discuss the topic sometime so they can save themselves a whole lot of headache in the future.
