>>44736492>>44738784>Remember when there were people who got frustrated and argued against For a long time I interpreted that charitably as people being protective or concerned she would face harassment over it, and wanting to deny those antis/harassers that kind of ammo. Took me a long time to see that it's some deeply held opinion that they really, really need to be right about. I just don't get it. I don't passionately believe she is gay, I just don't think of it as something I absolutely MUST know or be absolutely confident in.
Heck, I'm not even invested in the sexual orientations of people I know IRL, so I can't relate to people that get very, very invested in someone's sexual orientation over the internet. I believe that is an example of what the kids call "having no chill"?
