>>44805394>7. Comments that can be considered offensive to the rights holder of a game during a streamThis has to be the dumbest excuse. So she called a non sponsored game "bad" and that counted as rule infringement?
>8. Giving false info to other NijiEN livers regarding the contents of her communications with ANYCOLOR IncShe's not obliged to tell her situation with the management to her coworkers. So giving them vague updates to non interested parties or saying everything is okay is "giving false info"?
>9. Falsely claiming to have received permission from ANYCOLOR Inc after a viewer commented on Zaion performing an action prohibited by the Rules. First, I want to point out this wording means it happened just one/uno/eins. And I can infer that this was clearly a joke. Even if it wasn't a joke, where's the damage? Is the random viewer who commented on her chat a stakeholder?
>10. Falsely claiming to be sponsored by a brand during a streamIs that brand "deez nuts"?
>11. Giving "likes" to comments falling under defamation of NIJISANJI Livers and ANYCOLOR Inc using social media accounts that she personally operatesThis is a repeat of point 3. I guess they needed more filler and reposted the same stuff from point 3 here. You know the biggest offender of this rule? The Millie 4chan /vt/ larp stream, where they acknowledged every single defamation claim. Literally worse infractions than point 2, 3 and 11 by multiple livers
12. Numerous other infractions [...]
Well, if there are so numerous, why don't they list them instead of repeating a point?
