>>48738841Bayesianism (trying to talk about "agents" and redefining probability) is essentially philosophy/unfalsifiable, not really related to what I'm saying
Look up "Unsharp particle-wave duality in a photon split-beam experiment" by Mittelstaedt, Prieur, and Schieder [experimental] and "Complementarity in the double-slit experiment: Quantum nonseparability and a quantitative statement of Bohr's principle" by Wootters and Zurek [theoretical] (they use the language of Bohr complementarity but you can see more is going on).