/vt/ - Virtual YouTubers » Thread #49388727

[18 / 3 / 13]

670KiB, 1132x639, 1684044608517706.png

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 06:46:10 No.49388727 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>49391202 >>49392191 >>49393603 >>49393709 >>49393740 >>49393851 >>49394254 >>49394421

His poor, poor retention rates... Is this cyberbullying by the other members to kill him in the algorithm?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 06:48:41 No.49388861 Report

Quoted By:

Brutal as it may be, I imagine this is the norm for botw/totk streams unless you're a god tier entertainer

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 07:41:23 No.49391202 Report

Quoted By:

>>49388727
This looks like the average solo flayon numbers, people only watch him on collabs, all his solo streams are an average of 500 views sometimes less

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 07:56:43 No.49391797 Report

Quoted By:

Nintendo games are known to not do well along with RPGs. A few exceptions to this are based on condition. Mario Kart if it's leading up or for a tournament do well. Mario Party fitting into the rage category alongside Uno and monopoly for collabs do well. Everything else is up in the air. If it does well, there is probably like a certain association in particular for that vtuber.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 08:07:23 No.49392191 Report

Quoted By: >>49393758

>>49388727
i tried to give him a chance, but man his voice is annoying, solo streams are unbearable

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1684044106049974.jpg, 293KiB, 2000x1333

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 08:46:51 No.49393603 Report

Quoted By:

>>49388727
Help

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 08:50:35 No.49393709 Report

Quoted By: >>49393996

>>49388727
>Cyberbullying
When?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 08:51:21 No.49393740 Report

Quoted By:

>>49388727
who

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 08:52:03 No.49393758 Report

Quoted By:

>>49392191
This. He's only really good in tempus collabs and even then, that's at his best. He is extremely awkward in every other Collab outside of Tempus

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 08:54:54 No.49393851 Report

Quoted By:

>>49388727
At least one of these was a raid by a JP member, which dropped off quick for obvious reasons.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1667222387092559.jpg, 53KiB, 510x532

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 08:55:29 No.49393876 Report

Quoted By: >>49394259

I don't get this board's number hateboner for Flayon and Flayon in particular.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 08:58:44 No.49393996 Report

Quoted By: >>49394211

>>49393709
Not OP, but he was probably shitposting about all those raids.
Several streamers have said how poor viewer retention would kill your channel in the algorithm. Going by that logic, raids which sharply bleed viewers right after like in OP's pic are more harmful towards the recipients than helpful.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 09:04:08 No.49394211 Report

Quoted By: >>49395734

>>49393996
Isn't the concept of raiding basically just showing the raider's streamer audience to the raidee? If they left after the raid they aren't interested in the content or the person but a few would definitely remain.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 09:05:10 No.49394254 Report

Quoted By:

>>49388727
Raids always look like that

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 09:05:17 No.49394259 Report

Quoted By:

>>49393876
It's that one nigger from Tennessee that's been doing it lately. Flayon is the runt of Tempus so of course he's digging stuff to "le own the homos" even though no one gives a shit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 09:09:34 No.49394421 Report

Quoted By:

>>49388727
Cyberbullying would be buying him ads for demographics that will click off.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 09:12:06 No.49394517 Report

Quoted By:

ive heard good things of his pl. what happened? is he vastly different now? is he holding back?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2023 09:45:24 No.49395734 Report

Quoted By:

>>49394211
Yes. Thus, basically whenever a raid bled like in OP's picrel, you got a bunch of viewers joined the streams and left shortly afterwards. That kind of terribly low viewer retention can't be healthy for the algorithm

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches