>>50395381>>50393688>Overall ccv is a useless metric but it's the only one numbertrannies have because nijisanji started outdoing hololive in every other regardWhy do Nijisisters lie that often? Even if we are to ignore CCV
>Less views per VOD>Less views per streamer if you want to look at groups as a whole>Much fewer merch sales if the leaked Selen's merch was an indication>Lower total subsand
>luxiem debuted and reached 1 million subscribers after being culled multiple times and council still haven'CouncilRyS was, and is still being culled sub-wise on daily basis according to Irys.
I meant, sure, if you want to "win" by being the grinder group who prioritize quantity over quality, feel free to go ahead. There is a reason why nips tracking sites track CCV first and foremost.
People picked CCV because of one simple thing: it's a simple, easy to understand metric. WYSIWYG.
Leaving the cull asides - which is more favorable since Luxiem is much less culled than HoloEN or NijiEN females, mind you - 1 CCV = 1 person watching your stream. Higher CCV = more people are being interested your stream. Nothing more, nothing less - a great metric for the horse race, if you want to put it coarsely. That's also why Cover asks their applicants for their peak CCVs, not subs, views or donations.
Other metrics are either affected by multiple different factors so you can't just simply say "Oh, X is more popular than Y because X has better <metric> in general" without analyzing each and every factors; or simply don't reflect how popular a streamer is or how well they are doing at all (i.e: SC after we found out how corpo chuubas had been making millions from merchs)
