>/vt/ is a small fraction of the Western vtuber fanbase
>has thousands of daily users
>meaning it's a statistically significant sample size
>unironic unicorns run this board overall
>at least half of the posters minimum
>hololive has the biggest unicorns in existence among their top talents
>multiple small corpos have more unicorn chuubas than not
>Japanese and English companies with contractual terms prohibiting male collabs exist
Where did the idea that unicorns are some small, irrelevant minority originate from?
every single site that discusses vtubers nowadays at bare minimum acknowledges the existence of unicorns and correctly links them to gachikoi as well.
they're not imaginary, nor is it a bad thing that unicorns exist. Why do people here fall for normalfag shaming tactics?(besides the normalfags/sexhavers here, none of you were invited in the first place though)

And for reference I am using the """new""" definition of unicorn which is no guy collabs and no fucking while active as a vtuber since the virgin one is way out of use and almost pointless