>>5460013But if Jesus is IDENTIFIED with logos, then it doesn't make sense for either a nonspecific "one word" or the "another word" it brings to be Christ. The only way this could be justified is by seriously reading in that the one word is the Father's and the another is the Son, but neither is given the uniqueness or reverence it deserves for this insinuation to be probable (e.g. they are both merely "one word," or "another word," and neither "the Word" with a definitive article).
Somebody says that the "brings" word is actually the same as "begets" which would confirm this, but I'm an EOP and can't even into kana, let alone ancient greek..
