>>54623172It's an axiom, a Lamy is a Lamy, whatever is not a Lamy is not a Lamy and all Lamies are the same, only that which is not a Lamy is different from a Lamy, the Lamy also knows that she is a Lamy by virtue of knowing she is not a not Lamy, the way she knows she is not a not Lamy is by taking the absolute value in the matrix of a "Lamy" and substracting her own absolute value in the matrix, that tells the Lamy that the "Lamy" she is refering to and her own value are one and the same if the value of the substraction equals 0, which is the same as stating that a Lamy is what she is and not what she is not, that is not a Lamy, this is also known as the error value, if there is change in the state of the Lamy that turns her into a not Lamy, the Lamy can know she is no longer a Lamy by substracting the absolute value of a previous point on the past where she was a Lamy from the point in the future where she is not, and then, changing her current state to a not Lamy that she currently is and updating her previous state as not Lamy that she was but now is not.
